Sharp Thresholds of the Information Cascade Fragility Under a Mismatched Model
Wasim Huleihel, Ofer Shayevitz

TL;DR
This paper investigates how mismatched beliefs about the likelihood of players ignoring previous decisions affect the fragility of information cascades, revealing phase transitions in learning rates through theoretical analysis.
Contribution
It introduces a mismatch model where players' beliefs about revealing probabilities differ from reality, analyzing its impact on cascade fragility and deriving closed-form learning rate expressions.
Findings
Identifies phase transitions in asymptotic learning rates.
Provides closed-form expressions for optimal learning rates.
Shows how belief mismatch influences cascade stability.
Abstract
We analyze a sequential decision making model in which decision makers (or, players) take their decisions based on their own private information as well as the actions of previous decision makers. Such decision making processes often lead to what is known as the \emph{information cascade} or \emph{herding} phenomenon. Specifically, a cascade develops when it seems rational for some players to abandon their own private information and imitate the actions of earlier players. The risk, however, is that if the initial decisions were wrong, then the whole cascade will be wrong. Nonetheless, information cascade are known to be fragile: there exists a sequence of \emph{revealing} probabilities , such that if with probability player ignores the decisions of previous players, and rely on his private information only, then wrong cascades can be avoided.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Applications · Auction Theory and Applications · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
