Analyzing Differentiable Fuzzy Implications
Emile van Krieken, Erman Acar, Frank van Harmelen

TL;DR
This paper investigates the behavior of fuzzy implications in differentiable settings, revealing limitations of existing implications, introducing sigmoidal implications, and demonstrating their effectiveness in semi-supervised learning.
Contribution
It analyzes formal properties of fuzzy implications in differentiable contexts, identifies issues, and proposes a new family of implications that improve semi-supervised learning performance.
Findings
Existing fuzzy implications are often unsuitable for differentiable learning.
Sigmoidal implications address gradient imbalance issues.
Sigmoidal implications outperform other fuzzy implications in semi-supervised tasks.
Abstract
Combining symbolic and neural approaches has gained considerable attention in the AI community, as it is often argued that the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches are complementary. One such trend in the literature are weakly supervised learning techniques that employ operators from fuzzy logics. In particular, they use prior background knowledge described in such logics to help the training of a neural network from unlabeled and noisy data. By interpreting logical symbols using neural networks (or grounding them), this background knowledge can be added to regular loss functions, hence making reasoning a part of learning. In this paper, we investigate how implications from the fuzzy logic literature behave in a differentiable setting. In such a setting, we analyze the differences between the formal properties of these fuzzy implications. It turns out that various fuzzy…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
