Scaling Up Distance-generalized Core Decomposition

TL;DR

This paper introduces a novel, efficient peeling algorithm for distance-generalized core decomposition that significantly speeds up computations on large networks, especially for larger values of h.

Contribution

It proposes a new $h$-degree updating technique using bitmap methods, enabling faster and more scalable core decomposition algorithms.

Findings

Achieves up to 10x speedup with the exact algorithm for h ≥ 3.

Achieves up to 100x speedup with the sampling-based algorithm.

Demonstrates effectiveness on 12 real-world graphs.

Abstract

Core decomposition is a fundamental operator in network analysis. In this paper, we study the problem of computing distance-generalized core decomposition on a network. A distance-generalized core, also termed $(k, h)$-core, is a maximal subgraph in which every vertex has at least $k$ other vertices at distance no larger than $h$. The state-of-the-art algorithm for solving this problem is based on a peeling technique which iteratively removes the vertex (denoted by $v$) from the graph that has the smallest $h$-degree. The $h$-degree of a vertex $v$ denotes the number of other vertices that are reachable from $v$ within $h$ hops. Such a peeling algorithm, however, needs to frequently recompute the $h$-degrees of $v$'s neighbors after deleting $v$, which is typically very costly for a large $h$. To overcome this limitation, we propose an efficient peeling algorithm based on a novel $h$-degree updating technique. Instead of recomputing the $h$-degrees, our algorithm can dynamically maintain the $h$-degrees for all vertices via exploring a very small subgraph, after peeling a vertex. We show that such an $h$-degree updating procedure can be efficiently implemented by an elegant bitmap technique. In addition, we also propose a sampling-based algorithm and a parallelization technique to further improve the efficiency. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments on 12 real-world graphs to evaluate our algorithms. The results show that, when $h\ge 3$, our exact and sampling-based algorithms can achieve up to $10\times$ and $100\times$ speedup over the state-of-the-art algorithm, respectively.