Evaluating Transport Protocols on 5G for Mobile Augmented Reality
Jacky Cao, Xiang Su, Benjamin Finley, Pengyuan Zhou, Pan Hui

TL;DR
This study evaluates the performance of various transport protocols like UDP, TCP, MPEG-TS, RTP, and QUIC in supporting Mobile Augmented Reality over 5G, LTE, and WiFi, highlighting protocol efficiency and impact of signal quality.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive comparison of transport protocols for MAR on 5G, revealing their performance characteristics and influence of signal quality in real-world settings.
Findings
TCP has the lowest median round-trip-time on 5G.
QUIC performs better on LTE.
Protocol performance is significantly affected by signal quality.
Abstract
Mobile Augmented Reality (MAR) mixes physical environments with user-interactive virtual annotations. Immersive MAR experiences are supported by computation-intensive tasks which rely on offloading mechanisms to ease device workloads. However, this introduces additional network traffic which in turn influences the motion-to-photon latency (a determinant of user-perceived quality of experience). Therefore, a proper transport protocol is crucial to minimise transmission latency and ensure sufficient throughput to support MAR performance. Relatedly, 5G, a potential MAR supporting technology, is widely believed to be smarter, faster, and more efficient than its predecessors. However, the suitability and performance of existing transport protocols in MAR in the 5G context has not been explored. Therefore, we present an evaluation of popular transport protocols, including UDP, TCP, MPEG-TS,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIoT and Edge/Fog Computing · Caching and Content Delivery · Image and Video Quality Assessment
