Will $^{37}$Ar emissions from light water power reactors become an obstacle to its use for nuclear explosion monitoring?
Gerald Kirchner, Franziska Gerfen, Anna Heise, Timo Schl\"uschen

TL;DR
This paper assesses whether emissions of $^{37}$Ar from light water reactors could interfere with its use as an indicator for underground nuclear explosions, finding that routine emissions are generally below background levels, with exceptions during specific events.
Contribution
It identifies and quantifies various production pathways of $^{37}$Ar from reactors and evaluates their impact on nuclear explosion monitoring.
Findings
Routine reactor emissions are below cosmogenic background levels.
Inadvertent reactor restart can cause high $^{37}$Ar emissions.
High $^{41}$Ar emissions can help discriminate reactor signals from nuclear explosions.
Abstract
Ar is a promising candidate for complementing radioxenon isotopes as indicators of underground nuclear explosions. This study evaluates its potential anthropogenic background caused by emissions from commercial pressurised water reactors. Various Ar production pathways, which result from activation of Ar and of Ca, respectively, are identified and their emissions quantified. In-core processes include (1) the restart of operation and degassing of the primary cooling water after maintenance and refueling shutdown, (2) the replacement of primary coolant water for limiting its tritium concentrations, and (3) the leakage of Ar produced from calcium impurities in UO after fuel rod failures. Activation of air and of calcium in concrete within the biological shield are major out-of-core production pathways. Whereas emissions from in-core processes are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
