Systematic uncertainty of standard sirens from the viewing angle of binary neutron star inspirals
Hsin-Yu Chen

TL;DR
This paper investigates how viewing angle uncertainties in binary neutron star mergers can introduce significant systematic errors in measuring the Hubble constant with gravitational-wave standard sirens, potentially impacting cosmological tension resolution.
Contribution
It identifies and quantifies the systematic uncertainties from viewing angle effects, highlighting their importance over gravitational-wave calibration errors in standard siren measurements.
Findings
Viewing angle selection bias can cause >2% bias in Hubble constant.
Uncontrolled viewing angle constraints can lead to >3% systematic uncertainty.
Viewing angle effects are more significant than calibration uncertainties.
Abstract
The independent measurement of Hubble constant with gravitational-wave standard sirens will potentially shed light on the tension between the local distance ladders and Planck experiments. Therefore, thorough understanding of the sources of systematic uncertainty for the standard siren method is crucial. In this paper, we focus on two scenarios that will potentially dominate the systematic uncertainty of standard sirens. First, simulations of electromagnetic counterparts of binary neutron star mergers suggest aspherical emissions, so the binaries available for the standard siren method can be selected by their viewing angles. This selection effect can lead to bias in Hubble constant measurement even with mild selection. Second, if the binary viewing angles are constrained by the electromagnetic counterpart observations but the bias of the constraints is not controlled…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
