Examining the $N$ = 28 shell closure through high-precision mass measurements of $^{46-48}$Ar
Maxime Mougeot, Dinko Atanasov, Carlo Barbieri, Klaus Blaum, Martin, Breitenfeld, Antoine de Roubin, Thomas Duguet, Sebastian George, Frank, Herfurth, Alexander Herlert, Jason D. Holt, Jonas Karthein, David Lunney,, Vladimir Manea, Petr Navr\`atil, Dennis Neidherr

TL;DR
This study uses high-precision mass measurements of neutron-rich argon isotopes to investigate the persistence of the N=28 shell closure, comparing experimental data with advanced theoretical models to understand nuclear structure in this region.
Contribution
The paper provides the most precise mass measurements of $^{46-48}$Ar to date and compares these with state-of-the-art theoretical calculations, offering nuanced insights into the N=28 shell closure.
Findings
Mass values are up to 90 times more precise than previous data.
Results suggest N=28 shell closure persists in argon but with nuanced interpretation.
$^{46}$Ar is identified as a transitional nucleus between closed-shell and collective behaviors.
Abstract
The strength of the = 28 magic number in neutron-rich argon isotopes is examined through high-precision mass measurements of Ar, performed with the ISOLTRAP mass spectrometer at ISOLDE/CERN. The new mass values are up to 90 times more precise than previous measurements. While they suggest the persistence of the = 28 shell closure for argon, we show that this conclusion has to be nuanced in light of the wealth of spectroscopic data and theoretical investigations performed with the \emph{SDPF-U} phenomenological shell model interaction. Our results are also compared with \emph{ab initio} calculations using the Valence Space In-Medium Similarity Renormalization Group and the Self-Consistent Green's Function approaches. Both calculations provide a very good account of mass systematics at and around = 18 and, generally, a consistent description of the physics in this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
