Mapping the Galactic disk with the LAMOST and Gaia Red clump sample: I: precise distances, masses, ages and 3D velocities of $\sim$ 140000 red clump stars
Yang Huang (YNU-SWIFAR), Ralph Schonrich (UCL), Huawei Zhang, (PKU-KIAA), Yaqian Wu (NAOC), Bingqiu Chen (YNU-SWIFAR), Haifeng Wang, (YNU-SWIFAR), Maosheng Xiang (MPIA/NAOC), Chun Wang (PKU), Haibo Yuan (HBNU),, Xinyi Li (YNU-SWIFAR), Weixiang Sun (YNU-SWIFAR), Ji Li (HBNU)

TL;DR
This study constructs a large, high-quality sample of red clump stars with precise distances, ages, and velocities, enabling detailed mapping of the Galactic disk and improving distance calibration methods.
Contribution
It introduces a new calibration of red clump star distances considering metallicity and age, and provides a comprehensive, high-precision dataset for Galactic structure studies.
Findings
Achieved 5-10% distance accuracy for ~140,000 RC stars.
Calibrated K_s absolute magnitudes considering metallicity and age.
Sample covers a large volume of the Galactic disk, enabling detailed structural analysis.
Abstract
We present a sample of 140,000 primary red clump (RC) stars of spectral signal-to-noise ratios higher than 20 from the LAMOST Galactic spectroscopic surveys, selected based on their positions in the metallicity-dependent effective temperature--surface gravity and color--metallicity diagrams, supervised by high-quality asteroseismology data. The stellar masses and ages of those stars are further determined from the LAMOST spectra, using the Kernel Principal Component Analysis method, trained with thousands of RCs in the LAMOST- fields with accurate asteroseismic mass measurements. The purity and completeness of our primary RC sample are generally higher than 80 per cent. For the mass and age, a variety of tests show typical uncertainties of 15 and 30 per cent, respectively. Using over ten thousand primary RCs with accurate distance measurements from the parallaxes…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
