Revisiting Soltan's argument based on a semi-analytical model for galaxy and black hole evolution
Hikari Shirakata (1,2), Toshihiro Kawaguchi (3), Takashi Okamoto (1),, Masahiro Nagashima (4), and Taira Oogi (5) ((1) Hokkaido University, (2), Tadano Ltd. (3) Onomichi City University, (4) Bunkyo University, (5) KAVLI, IPMU, The University of Tokyo)

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that super-Eddington accretion plays a significant role in the growth of supermassive black holes, challenging traditional interpretations of Soltan's argument and providing a semi-analytical model consistent with observations.
Contribution
It introduces a semi-analytical model showing super-Eddington accretion's importance in SMBH growth, revisiting Soltan's argument with new insights.
Findings
Super-Eddington accretion contributes significantly to SMBH mass growth.
SMBHs with > 10^9 Msun acquire over 50% of their mass via super-Eddington phases.
Mass-weighted radiation efficiency at z=0 is about 0.08, consistent with Soltan's argument.
Abstract
We show the significance of the super-Eddington accretion for the cosmic growth of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) with a semi-analytical model for galaxy and black hole evolution. The model explains various observed properties of galaxies and active galactic nuclei at a wide redshift range. By tracing the growth history of individual SMBHs, we find that the fraction of the SMBH mass acquired during the super-Eddington accretion phases to the total SMBH mass becomes larger for less massive black holes and at higher redshift. Even at z = 0, SMBHs with > 1e+9 Msun have acquired more than 50% of their mass by super-Eddington accretions, which is apparently inconsistent with classical Soltan's argument. However, the mass-weighted radiation efficiency of SMBHs with > 1e+8 Msun obtained with our model, is about 0.08 at z = 0, which is consistent with Soltan's argument within the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
