Charged particle guiding and beam splitting with auto-ponderomotive potentials on a chip
Robert Zimmermann (1), Michael Seidling (1), Peter Hommelhoff (1) ((1), Department Physik, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU),, Erlangen, Germany)

TL;DR
This paper introduces a chip-based electrostatic system that guides and splits charged particle beams using customizable ponderomotive potentials, enabling advanced control over electrons and ions across a wide energy and mass range.
Contribution
The work presents a novel planar electrode design for creating tunable ponderomotive potentials, allowing precise manipulation of charged particles on a chip, surpassing traditional Paul traps.
Findings
Successfully guided electrons and ions from 20 to 5000 eV.
Demonstrated electron beam splitting as a proof-of-concept.
Achieved simultaneous confinement of particles with different masses.
Abstract
We report guiding and manipulation of charged particle beams by means of electrostatic optics based on a principle similar to the electrodynamic Paul trap. We use hundreds of electrodes fabricated on planar substrates and supplied with static voltages to create a ponderomotive potential for charged particles in motion. Shape and strength of the potential can be locally tailored by the electrodes' layout and the applied voltages, enabling the control of charged particle beams within precisely engineered effective potentials. We demonstrate guiding of electrons and ions for a large range of energies (from 20 to 5000 eV) and masses (5E-4 to 131 atomic mass units) as well as electron beam splitting as a proof-of-concept for more complex beam manipulation. Simultaneous confinement of charged particles with different masses is possible, as well as guiding of electrons with energies in the keV…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
