Translating Cyber-Physical Control Application Requirements to Network level Parameters
Milad Ganjalizadeh, Abdulrahman Alabbasi, Joachim Sachs, Marina, Petrova

TL;DR
This paper develops a mapping from application-level reliability and latency requirements of cyber-physical control systems to network parameters in 5G, enabling better network configuration for such demanding applications.
Contribution
It introduces a novel theoretical framework linking application requirements to network parameters in wireless systems, validated through realistic factory automation simulations.
Findings
The mapping function accurately predicts network performance under various conditions.
Simulations confirm the framework's effectiveness in meeting application reliability and latency needs.
The approach guides network configuration to optimize reliability and utilization.
Abstract
Cyber-physical control applications impose strict requirements on the reliability and latency of the underlying communication system. Hence, they have been mostly implemented using wired channels where the communication service is highly predictable. Nevertheless, fulfilling such stringent demands is envisioned with the fifth generation of mobile networks (5G). The requirements of such applications are often defined on the application layer. However, cyber-physical control applications can usually tolerate sparse packet loss, and therefore it is not at all obvious what configurations and settings these application level requirements impose on the underlying wireless network. In this paper, we apply the fundamental metrics from reliability literature to wireless communications and derive a mapping function between application level requirements and network level parameters for those…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
