EXPRES I. HD~3651 an Ideal RV Benchmark
John M. Brewer, Debra A. Fischer, Ryan T. Blackman, Samuel H. C., Cabot, Allen B. Davis, Gregory Laughlin, Christopher Leet, J. M. Joel Ong,, Ryan R. Petersburg, Andrew E. Szymkowiak, Lily L. Zhao, Gregory W. Henry, and, Joe Llama

TL;DR
This paper introduces HD 3651 as a benchmark for evaluating the long-term precision of extreme precision radial velocity (EPRV) programs, highlighting its suitability due to its stable, well-characterized planetary orbit and low residual errors.
Contribution
The paper presents HD 3651 as an ideal RV benchmark for EPRV, demonstrating its stability and low residuals, aiding in error source mitigation for exoplanet detection.
Findings
HD 3651 has a 62-day orbit with a residual RMS of 58 cm/s.
HD 3651's orbit helps eliminate significant error contributors in RV measurements.
It serves as a standard for evaluating long-term precision of EPRV programs.
Abstract
The next generation of exoplanet-hunting spectrographs should deliver up to an order of magnitude improvement in radial velocity precision over the standard 1 m/s state of the art. This advance is critical for enabling the detection of Earth-mass planets around Sun-like stars. New calibration techniques such as laser frequency combs and stabilized etalons ensure that the instrumental stability is well characterized. However, additional sources of error include stellar noise, undetected short-period planets, and telluric contamination. To understand and ultimately mitigate error sources, the contributing terms in the error budget must be isolated to the greatest extent possible. Here, we introduce a new high cadence radial velocity program, the EXPRES 100 Earths program, which aims to identify rocky planets around bright, nearby G and K dwarfs. We also present a benchmark case: the 62-d…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
