Effect of axially varying sandpaper roughness on bubbly drag reduction in Taylor-Couette turbulence

TL;DR

This study experimentally examines how alternating rough and smooth walls in Taylor-Couette flow affect bubbly drag reduction, revealing that roughness patterns influence bubble distribution and drag reduction effectiveness.

Contribution

It introduces a novel experimental setup with alternating rough and smooth wall patterns to analyze their impact on bubbly drag reduction in Taylor-Couette turbulence.

Findings

Alternating rough and smooth walls enhance bubbly drag reduction compared to fully rough walls.

Roughness induces more uniform bubble distribution and increased turbulence.

Maximum drag reduction is achieved at specific roughness patterns and flow conditions.

Abstract

We experimentally investigate the influence of alternating rough and smooth walls on bubbly drag reduction (DR). We apply rough sandpaper bands of width $s$ between $48.4\,mm$ and $148.5\,mm$, and roughness height $k = 695\,{\mu}m$, around the smooth inner cylinder (IC) of the Twente Turbulent Taylor-Couette facility. Between sandpaper bands, the IC is left uncovered over similar width $s$, resulting in alternating rough and smooth bands, a constant pattern in axial direction. We measure the DR in water that originates from introducing air bubbles to the fluid at (shear) Reynolds numbers $\textit{Re}_s$ ranging from $0.5 \times 10^6$ to $1.8 \times 10^6$. Results are compared to bubbly DR measurements with a completely smooth IC and an IC that is completely covered with sandpaper of the same roughness $k$. The outer cylinder is left smooth for all variations. Results are also compared to bubbly DR measurements where a smooth outer cylinder is rotating in opposite direction to the smooth IC. This counter rotation induces secondary flow structures that are very similar to those observed when the IC is composed of alternating rough and smooth bands. For the measurements with roughness, the bubbly DR is found to initially increase more strongly with $\textit{Re}_s$, before levelling off to reach a value that no longer depends on $\textit{Re}_s$. This is attributed to a more even axial distribution of the air bubbles, resulting from the increased turbulence intensity of the flow compared to flow over a completely smooth wall at the same $\textit{Re}_s$. The air bubbles are seen to accumulate at the rough wall sections in the flow. Here, locally, the drag is largest and so the drag reducing effect of the bubbles is felt strongest. Therefore, a larger maximum value of bubbly DR is found for the alternating rough and smooth walls compared to the completely rough wall.