OSSOS XX: The Meaning of Kuiper Belt Colors
David Nesvorny, David Vokrouhlicky, Mike Alexandersen, Michele T., Bannister, Laura E. Buchanan, Ying-Tung Chen, Brett J. Gladman, Stephen D. J., Gwyn, J. J. Kavelaars, Jean-Marc Petit, Megan E. Schwamb, Kathryn Volk

TL;DR
This study investigates the color bimodality of Kuiper belt objects, suggesting a formation origin based on their surface compositions and radial distances, supported by migration simulations.
Contribution
It proposes a model where R and VR KBOs formed at different radial distances, explaining their color distribution and orbital properties.
Findings
R objects formed at r<r* and VR objects at r>r*
VR objects in hot populations have smaller inclinations
Color bimodality linked to formation location and orbital excitation
Abstract
Observations show that 100-km-class Kuiper belt objects (KBOs) can be divided in (at least) two color groups, hereafter red (R, g-i<1.2) and very red (VR, g-i>1.2), reflecting a difference in their surface composition. This is thought to imply that KBOs formed over a relatively wide range of radial distance, r. The cold classicals at 42<r<47 au are predominantly VR and known Neptune Trojans at r=30 au are mostly R. Intriguingly, however, the dynamically hot KBOs show a mix of R and VR colors and no correlation of color with r. Here we perform migration/instability simulations where the Kuiper belt is populated from an extended planetesimal disk. We find that the color observations can be best understood if R objects formed at r<r* and VR objects at r>r*, with 30<r*<40 au. The proposed transition at 30<r*<40 au would explain why the VR objects in the dynamically hot population have…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
