Precision mass measurements of neutron-rich scandium isotopes refine the evolution of $N=32$ and $N=34$ shell closures
E. Leistenschneider, E. Dunling, G. Bollen, B.A. Brown, J. Dilling, A., Hamaker, J.D. Holt, A. Jacobs, A.A. Kwiatkowski, T. Miyagi, W.S. Porter, D., Puentes, M. Redshaw, M.P. Reiter, R. Ringle, R. Sandler, C.S., Sumithrarachchi, A.A. Valverde, I.T. Yandow, the TITAN Collaboration

TL;DR
This study provides high-precision mass measurements of neutron-rich scandium isotopes, refining the understanding of shell closures at N=32 and N=34, and challenges some theoretical predictions about neutron shell gaps.
Contribution
It offers the first precise mass measurements for $^{50-55}$Sc isotopes, significantly reducing uncertainties and updating the nuclear shell model descriptions at N=32 and N=34.
Findings
Mass uncertainties reduced significantly.
Confirms peak of neutron shell gap at $^{52}$Ca.
Does not support N=34 shell closure in $^{55}$Sc.
Abstract
We report high-precision mass measurements of Sc isotopes performed at the LEBIT facility at NSCL and at the TITAN facility at TRIUMF. Our results provide a substantial reduction of their uncertainties and indicate significant deviations, up to 0.7 MeV, from the previously recommended mass values for Sc. The results of this work provide an important update to the description of emerging closed-shell phenomena at neutron numbers and above proton-magic . In particular, they finally enable a complete and precise characterization of the trends in ground state binding energies along the isotone, confirming that the empirical neutron shell gap energies peak at the doubly-magic Ca. Moreover, our data, combined with other recent measurements, does not support the existence of closed neutron shell in Sc at . The results were…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
