Do Private Household Transfers to the Elderly Respond to Public Pension Benefits? Evidence from Rural China
Plamen Nikolov, Alan Adelman

TL;DR
This study investigates how public pension benefits influence private household transfers to the elderly in rural China, revealing a small crowd-out effect and highlighting the interaction between public and private support systems.
Contribution
It provides the first empirical evidence from a developing country showing pension benefits reduce private transfers, with a novel difference-in-difference-in-differences approach.
Findings
Pension benefits decrease the likelihood of receiving transfers from adult children.
Small crowd-out effect of pension benefits on private transfers.
Estimates of crowd-out are smaller than those in high-income countries.
Abstract
Ageing populations in developing countries have spurred the introduction of public pension programs to preserve the standard of living for the elderly. The often-overlooked mechanism of intergenerational transfers, however, can dampen these intended policy effects as adult children who make income contributions to their parents could adjust their behavior to changes in their parents' income. Exploiting a unique policy intervention in China, we examine using a difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) approach how a new pension program impacts inter vivos transfers. We show that pension benefits lower the propensity of receiving transfers from adult children in the context of a large middle-income country and we also estimate a small crowd-out effect. Taken together, these estimates fit the pattern of previous research in high-income countries, although our estimates of the crowd-out…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
