TL;DR
This paper presents a Bayesian hierarchical model to correct misclassification errors in crowdsourced ecological data, improving the accuracy of ecological indicators derived from citizen science classifications.
Contribution
The paper introduces a Bayesian approach that accounts for participant abilities and spatial factors, enhancing the analysis of crowdsourced ecological data over traditional methods.
Findings
Model outperforms weighted-regression approaches
Produces more accurate regression coefficients
Better characterizes the latent ecological process
Abstract
Many research domains use data elicited from "citizen scientists" when a direct measure of a process is expensive or infeasible. However, participants may report incorrect estimates or classifications due to their lack of skill. We demonstrate how Bayesian hierarchical models can be used to learn about latent variables of interest, while accounting for the participants' abilities. The model is described in the context of an ecological application that involves crowdsourced classifications of georeferenced coral-reef images from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. The latent variable of interest is the proportion of coral cover, which is a common indicator of coral reef health. The participants' abilities are expressed in terms of sensitivity and specificity of a correctly classified set of points on the images. The model also incorporates a spatial component, which allows prediction of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
