Measurement of inclusive charged-particle jet production in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=200 GeV
STAR Collaboration: J. Adam, L. Adamczyk, J. R. Adams, J. K. Adkins,, G. Agakishiev, M. M. Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed, I. Alekseev, D. M. Anderson, A., Aparin, E. C. Aschenauer, M. U. Ashraf, F. G. Atetalla, A. Attri, G. S., Averichev, V. Bairathi, K. Barish, A. Behera, R. Bellwied

TL;DR
This paper reports the first measurement of inclusive charged-particle jet production in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV, showing suppression in central collisions and consistency with jet quenching models.
Contribution
It provides the first experimental measurement of inclusive charged-particle jets in Au+Au collisions at RHIC energies, including background suppression and comparison with theoretical models.
Findings
Charged-particle jet yield is suppressed in central Au+Au collisions.
No significant medium-induced broadening observed for R<0.4.
Results are consistent with jet quenching models.
Abstract
The STAR Collaboration at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider reports the first measurement of inclusive jet production in peripheral and central Au+Au collisions at =200 GeV. Jets are reconstructed with the anti-k algorithm using charged tracks with pseudorapidity and transverse momentum GeV/, with jet resolution parameter =0.2, 0.3, and 0.4. The large background yield uncorrelated with the jet signal is observed to be dominated by statistical phase space, consistent with a previous coincidence measurement. This background is suppressed by requiring a high-transverse-momentum (high-) leading hadron in accepted jet candidates. The bias imposed by this requirement is assessed, and the region in which the bias is small is identified. Inclusive charged-particle jet distributions are reported in peripheral and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
