Inverse problems for minimal complements and maximal supplements
Noga Alon, Noah Kravitz, Matt Larson

TL;DR
This paper characterizes which subsets of finite abelian groups can serve as minimal complements for some other subset, revealing that most small subsets are minimal complements and extending results to infinite groups and dual problems.
Contribution
It proves that all sufficiently small subsets in finite abelian groups are minimal complements and extends the concept to infinite groups and dual problems.
Findings
Most small subsets in finite abelian groups are minimal complements.
Every non-empty subset of an infinite abelian group is a minimal complement.
Analogous results are established for maximal supplements.
Abstract
Given a subset of an abelian group , a subset is called an additive complement for if ; if, moreover, no proper subset of has this property, then we say that is a minimal complement for . It is natural to ask which subsets can arise as minimal complements for some . We show that in a finite abelian group , every non-empty subset of size is a minimal complement for some . As a corollary, we deduce that every finite non-empty subset of an infinite abelian group is a minimal complement. We also derive several analogous results for ``dual'' problems about maximal supplements.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
