Prevalence Threshold and the Geometry of Screening Curves
Jacques Balayla

TL;DR
This paper mathematically explores the relationship between screening test predictive value and prevalence, introducing a prevalence threshold that impacts test interpretation and proposing a fundamental theorem of screening.
Contribution
It defines the prevalence threshold mathematically and derives a generalized relationship between prevalence and predictive value, advancing theoretical understanding of screening test performance.
Findings
Derived the prevalence threshold formula $rac{ ext{sqrt}(1-b)}{ ext{sqrt}(a)+ ext{sqrt}(1-b)}$.
Established a fundamental theorem linking the integral of predictive value over prevalence to 1 as sensitivity and specificity approach optimal values.
Provided insights to interpret screening test validity in clinical scenarios.
Abstract
The relationship between a screening tests' positive predictive value, , and its target prevalence, , is proportional - though not linear in all but a special case. In consequence, there is a point of local extrema of curvature defined only as a function of the sensitivity and specificity beyond which the rate of change of a test's drops precipitously relative to . Herein, we show the mathematical model exploring this phenomenon and define the () point where this change occurs as: where = +. Using its radical conjugate, we obtain a simplified version of the equation: . From the prevalence threshold we deduce a more generalized relationship between prevalence and positive predictive value as a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
