OER Recommendations to Support Career Development

TL;DR

This paper proposes a novel personalized OER recommendation system that aligns open educational resources with individual skill development goals, supported by a quality prediction model and labor market data, demonstrated through a prototype for Data Science jobs.

Contribution

It introduces a new personalized OER recommendation method combining quality prediction, labor market data, and user skill targets, addressing previous limitations in metadata quality and personalization.

Findings

Over 400 recommendations generated in the prototype.

80.9% of recommendations rated as useful by users.

Prototype focused on Data Science jobs and diverse expertise levels.

Abstract

This Work in Progress Research paper departs from the recent, turbulent changes in global societies, forcing many citizens to re-skill themselves to (re)gain employment. Learners therefore need to be equipped with skills to be autonomous and strategic about their own skill development. Subsequently, high-quality, on-line, personalized educational content and services are also essential to serve this high demand for learning content. Open Educational Resources (OERs) have high potential to contribute to the mitigation of these problems, as they are available in a wide range of learning and occupational contexts globally. However, their applicability has been limited, due to low metadata quality and complex quality control. These issues resulted in a lack of personalised OER functions, like recommendation and search. Therefore, we suggest a novel, personalised OER recommendation method to match skill development targets with open learning content. This is done by: 1) using an OER quality prediction model based on metadata, OER properties, and content; 2) supporting learners to set individual skill targets based on actual labour market information, and 3) building a personalized OER recommender to help learners to master their skill targets. Accordingly, we built a prototype focusing on Data Science related jobs, and evaluated this prototype with 23 data scientists in different expertise levels. Pilot participants used our prototype for at least 30 minutes and commented on each of the recommended OERs. As a result, more than 400 recommendations were generated and 80.9% of the recommendations were reported as useful.