Explainable Artificial Intelligence: a Systematic Review
Giulia Vilone, Luca Longo

TL;DR
This systematic review analyzes the rapid growth of XAI methods, categorizing them into four clusters, summarizing current advancements, and suggesting future research directions to improve explainability in AI models.
Contribution
It provides a hierarchical classification of XAI methods, consolidates current knowledge, and offers a structured overview of the field for future research guidance.
Findings
Hierarchical classification of XAI methods
Summary of state-of-the-art in XAI
Recommendations for future research directions
Abstract
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has experienced a significant growth over the last few years. This is due to the widespread application of machine learning, particularly deep learning, that has led to the development of highly accurate models but lack explainability and interpretability. A plethora of methods to tackle this problem have been proposed, developed and tested. This systematic review contributes to the body of knowledge by clustering these methods with a hierarchical classification system with four main clusters: review articles, theories and notions, methods and their evaluation. It also summarises the state-of-the-art in XAI and recommends future research directions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Machine Learning in Healthcare · Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
