
TL;DR
This paper proposes an ontology rooted in QBism and related philosophies, emphasizing that reality is relative to consciousness, which clarifies longstanding issues in philosophy of science and mind.
Contribution
It introduces a novel ontology integrating QBism, philosophical traditions, and evolutionary thought, addressing unresolved issues in science and consciousness.
Findings
Clarifies the role of consciousness in defining reality
Resolves issues related to instrument reification
Addresses the problem of intentionality and self-world inclusion
Abstract
This paper puts forward an ontology that is indebted to QBism, Kant, Bohr, Schr\"odinger, the philosophy of the Upanishads, and the evolutionary philosophy of Sri Aurobindo. Central to it is that reality is relative to consciousness or experience. Instead of a single mind-independent reality, there are different poises of consciousness, including a consciousness to which ``we are all really only various aspects of the One'' (Schr\"odinger). This ontology helps clear up unresolved issues in the philosophy of science, such as arise from the reification of either instruments or calculational tools, or from a disregard of the universal context of science, which is human experience. It further helps clear up unresolved issues in the philosophy of mind, among them the problem of intentionality and the dilemma posed by the mutual inclusion of self and world (Husserl's paradox of human…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
