TL;DR
This paper develops machine learning models to accurately predict product state distributions in atom-diatom collisions, demonstrating high accuracy and practical applicability in complex flow scenarios.
Contribution
It introduces and compares function-, kernel-, and grid-based ML models for predicting collision outcomes, highlighting the superior accuracy and practicality of grid-based methods.
Findings
All models achieve R^2 > 0.998 in predictions.
Grid-based approach performs best overall.
Kernel- and grid-based methods are more accurate and practical than function-based methods.
Abstract
Machine learning-based models to predict product state distributions from a distribution of reactant conditions for atom-diatom collisions are presented and quantitatively tested. The models are based on function-, kernel- and grid-based representations of the reactant and product state distributions. While all three methods predict final state distributions from explicit quasi-classical trajectory simulations with R > 0.998, the grid-based approach performs best. Although a function-based approach is found to be more than two times better in computational performance, the kernel- and grid-based approaches are preferred in terms of prediction accuracy, practicability and generality. The function-based approach also suffers from lacking a general set of model functions. Applications of the grid-based approach to nonequilibrium, multi-temperature initial state distributions are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
