The dust-to-gas ratio, size distribution, and dust fall-back fraction of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko: Inferences from linking the optical and dynamical properties of the inner comae
Raphael Marschall, Johannes Markkanen, Selina-Barbara Gerig, Olga, Pinz\'on-Rodr\'iguez, Nicolas Thomas, and Jong-Shinn Wu

TL;DR
This study models the dust and gas emissions of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko during the Rosetta mission, constraining dust size distribution, dust-to-gas ratio, and mass loss rates through simulations and observational data comparison.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive 3D simulation approach linking optical and dynamical properties to constrain cometary dust and gas parameters.
Findings
Total volatile mass loss during 2015 was (6.1 ± 1.5) × 10^9 kg.
Dust ejection follows a power-law with index ~3.7.
Dust-to-gas ratio for escaping material is approximately 0.73.
Abstract
In this work, we present results that simultaneously constrain the dust size distribution, dust-to-gas ratio, fraction of dust re-deposition, and total mass production rates for comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. We use a 3D Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) gas dynamics code to simulate the inner gas coma of the comet for the duration of the Rosetta mission. The gas model is constrained by ROSINA/COPS data. Further, we simulate for different epochs the inner dust coma using a 3D dust dynamics code including gas drag and the nucleus' gravity. Using advanced dust scattering properties these results are used to produce synthetic images that can be compared to the OSIRIS data set. These simulations allow us to constrain the properties of the dust coma and the total gas and dust production rates. We determined a total volatile mass loss of ~kg during the 2015…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
