Searching for eV-scale sterile neutrinos with eight years of atmospheric neutrinos at the IceCube neutrino telescope
M. G. Aartsen, R. Abbasi, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. A. Aguilar, M., Ahlers, M. Ahrens, C. Alispach, N. M. Amin, K. Andeen, T. Anderson, I., Ansseau, G. Anton, C. Arg\"uelles, J. Auffenberg, S. Axani, H. Bagherpour, X., Bai, A. Balagopal V., A. Barbano, S. W. Barwick, B. Bastian

TL;DR
This study uses eight years of atmospheric neutrino data from IceCube to search for eV-scale sterile neutrinos, setting constraints on their properties and finding no significant evidence for their existence.
Contribution
First detailed analysis of atmospheric neutrino data from IceCube targeting eV-scale sterile neutrinos within a 3+1 model, including systematic uncertainties and confidence interval construction.
Findings
No strong evidence for sterile neutrinos was observed.
Best-fit likelihood is consistent with the no sterile neutrino hypothesis.
Constraints on sterile neutrino parameters were established.
Abstract
We report in detail on searches for eV-scale sterile neutrinos, in the context of a 3+1 model, using eight years of data from the IceCube neutrino telescope. By analyzing the reconstructed energies and zenith angles of 305,735 atmospheric and events we construct confidence intervals in two analysis spaces: vs. under the conservative assumption ; and vs. given sufficiently large that fast oscillation features are unresolvable. Detailed discussions of the event selection, systematic uncertainties, and fitting procedures are presented. No strong evidence for sterile neutrinos is found, and the best-fit likelihood is consistent with the no sterile neutrino hypothesis with a p-value of 8\% in the first analysis space and 19\% in the second.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
