Spitzer Variability Properties of Low-Gravity L Dwarfs
Johanna M. Vos, Beth A. Biller, Katelyn N. Allers, Jacqueline K., Faherty, Michael C. Liu, Stanimir Metchev, Simon Eriksson, Elena Manjavacas,, Trent J. Dupuy, Markus Janson, Jacqueline Radigan-Hoffman, Ian Crossfield,, Mickael Bonnefoy, William M. J. Best, Derek Homeier

TL;DR
This study uses Spitzer observations to analyze variability, rotation, and inclination in low-gravity L dwarfs, revealing correlations between amplitude, inclination, and color anomaly, and comparing rotation rates with evolutionary models.
Contribution
First detection of periodic variability in two low-gravity L dwarfs at mid-infrared wavelengths, and analysis of their inclination and amplitude relations with color anomalies.
Findings
Objects with higher variability amplitudes are viewed equator-on.
No amplitude enhancement in young, early-L dwarfs compared to field dwarfs.
Possible amplitude enhancement in low-gravity late-L dwarfs at 4.5 μm.
Abstract
We present \textit{Spitzer Space Telescope} variability monitoring observations of three low-gravity L dwarfs with previous detections of variability in the near-IR, 2MASS J0045+16, 2MASS J0501-00 and 2MASS J1425-36. We detect significant, periodic variability in two of our targets, 2MASS J0045+16 and 2MASS J0501-00. We do not detect variability in 2MASS J1425-36. Combining our new rotation periods with rotational velocities, we calculate inclination angles of , and for 2MASS J0045+16, 2MASS J0501-00 and 2MASS J1425-36 respectively. Our three new objects are consistent with the tentative relations between inclination, amplitude and color anomaly previously reported. Objects with the highest variability amplitudes are inclined equator-on, while the maximum observed amplitude decreases as the inclination angle…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
