Selection of massive evolved galaxies at $3 \leq z \leq 4.5$ in the CANDELS fields
Abtin Shahidi, Bahram Mobasher, Hooshang Nayyeri, Shoubaneh Hemmati,, Tommy Wiklind, Nima Chartab, Mark Dickinson, Steven L Finkelstein, Camilla, Pacifici, Casey Papovich, Henry C. Ferguson, Adriano Fontana, Mauro, Giavalisco, Anton Koekemoer, Jeffery Newman, Zahra Sattari

TL;DR
This study identifies and analyzes massive evolved galaxies at redshifts 3 to 4.5 using CANDELS data, comparing their number densities and stellar masses with models, and exploring implications for galaxy evolution and quenching mechanisms.
Contribution
It introduces a multi-method selection of massive evolved galaxies at high redshift and compares their properties with theoretical models, highlighting discrepancies and potential evolutionary insights.
Findings
Number densities of massive galaxies at z=3.4 and 4.7 are estimated.
Models tend to underestimate the observed number and mass densities.
Halo masses suggest efficient star formation and possible quenching mechanisms.
Abstract
Using the CANDELS photometric catalogs for the HST/ACS and WFC3, we identified massive evolved galaxies at , employing three different selection methods. We find the comoving number density of these objects to be and after correction for completeness for two redshift bins centered at . We quantify a measure of how much confidence we should have for each candidate galaxy from different selections and what are the conservative error estimates propagated into our selection. Then we compare the evolution of the corresponding number densities and their stellar mass density with numerical simulations, semi-analytical models, and previous observational estimates, which shows slight tension at higher redshifts as the models tend to underestimate the number and mass densities. By estimating the average halo masses of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
