COVID-19 and the Social Distancing Paradox: dangers and solutions
Massimo Marchiori

TL;DR
This study introduces a novel sensor-based dataset on social distancing during COVID-19, revealing behavioral paradoxes and demonstrating how masks and protective gear influence social distancing practices.
Contribution
It provides the first empirical social distancing data during COVID-19 and analyzes how PPE affects social behavior, offering new insights for public health strategies.
Findings
Masks improve social distancing behavior and break paradoxical patterns.
DIY masks can serve as a temporary solution when masks are scarce.
Goggles significantly enhance safety and should be recommended.
Abstract
Background: Without proven effect treatments and vaccines, Social Distancing is the key protection factor against COVID-19. Social distancing alone should have been enough to protect again the virus, yet things have gone very differently, with a big mismatch between theory and practice. What are the reasons? A big problem is that there is no actual social distancing data, and the corresponding people behavior in a pandemic is unknown. We collect the world-first dataset on social distancing during the COVID-19 outbreak, so to see for the first time how people really implement social distancing, identify dangers of the current situation, and find solutions against this and future pandemics. Methods: Using a sensor-based social distancing belt we collected social distance data from people in Italy for over two months during the most critical COVID-19 outbreak. Additionally, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCOVID-19 epidemiological studies · COVID-19 and Mental Health · COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
