On $\mathscr L$-invariants associated to Hilbert modular forms
Michael Spiess

TL;DR
This paper proves the equivalence of two different definitions of $\\mathscr{L}$-invariants associated to certain Hilbert modular forms, linking cohomological and Galois-theoretic perspectives.
Contribution
It establishes the equality of cohomological and Galois-theoretic $\mathscr{L}$-invariants for Hilbert modular forms with Steinberg local components.
Findings
The two $\\mathscr{L}$-invariants coincide for the considered forms.
The result bridges cohomology and Galois representations in the context of Hilbert modular forms.
Abstract
Given a cuspidal Hilbert modular eigenform of parallel weight 2 and a nonarchimedian place of the underlying totally real field such that the local component of at is the Steinberg representation, one can associate two types of -invariants, one defined in terms of the cohomology of arithmetic groups and the other in terms of the Galois representation associated to . We show that the -invariants are the same.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Geometry · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
