A Detailed Characterization of the Expert Problem-Solving Process in Science and Engineering; Guidance for Teaching and Assessment
Argenta Price, Candice Kim, Eric Burkholder, Amy Fritz, Carl Wieman

TL;DR
This paper presents a comprehensive, empirically grounded decision-based framework for understanding and teaching problem-solving in science and engineering, based on interviews with 52 experts across disciplines.
Contribution
It introduces a novel decision framework of 29 specific decisions that characterize expert problem-solving in science and engineering, grounded in empirical interviews.
Findings
Experts follow 29 key decisions in problem-solving
Decision-making relies on domain-specific predictive models
Framework can guide teaching and assessment of problem-solving
Abstract
A primary goal of science and engineering (S & E) education is to produce good problem solvers, but how to best teach and measure the quality of problem-solving remains unclear. The process is complex, multifaceted, and not fully characterized. Here we present a theoretical framework of the S & E problem-solving process as a set of specific interlinked decisions. This theory is empirically grounded and describes the entire process. To develop this theory, we interviewed 52 successful scientists and engineers (experts) spanning different disciplines, including biology and medicine. They described how they solved a typical but important problem in their work, and we analyzed the interviews in terms of decisions made. Surprisingly, we found that across all experts and fields, the solution process was framed around making a set of just twenty-nine specific decisions. We also found that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
