Examples and non-examples of integral categories and the admissible intersection property
Souheila Hassoun, Amit Shah, Sven-Ake Wegner

TL;DR
This paper investigates the properties of integral categories, their relation to quasi-abelian and semi-abelian categories, and characterizes quasi-abelian categories via admissible intersections, highlighting their relevance in functional analysis.
Contribution
It determines which categories of topological and bornological vector spaces are integral and characterizes quasi-abelian categories through admissible intersections.
Findings
Certain topological and bornological vector space categories are integral.
Integral categories are not contained within quasi-abelian categories.
Quasi-abelian categories are characterized by admissible intersections.
Abstract
Integral categories form a sub-class of pre-abelian categories whose systematic study was initiated by Rump in 2001. In the first part of this article we determine whether several categories of topological and bornological vector spaces are integral. Moreover, we establish that the class of integral categories is not contained in the class of quasi-abelian categories, and that there exist semi-abelian categories that are neither integral nor quasi-abelian. In the last part of the article we show that a category is quasi-abelian if and only if it has admissible intersections, in the sense considered recently by Br{\"u}stle, Hassoun and Tattar. This exhibits that a rich class of non-abelian categories having this property arises naturally in functional analysis.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Topics in Algebra
