Why are most COVID-19 infection curves linear?
Stefan Thurner, Peter Klimek, Rudolf Hanel

TL;DR
This paper explains the observed linear growth of COVID-19 cases in some countries during the containment phase by analyzing contact network structures, showing that below a critical contact number, linear growth is inevitable, challenging traditional models.
Contribution
The authors introduce a contact network-based model that accounts for linear infection growth, providing a new explanation for COVID-19 dynamics during containment phases.
Findings
Linear growth occurs when social contacts are below a critical threshold.
The model accurately reproduces infection curves for US and Austria.
Standard compartmental models rarely predict linear growth, unlike the network-based approach.
Abstract
Many countries have passed their first COVID-19 epidemic peak. Traditional epidemiological models describe this as a result of non-pharmaceutical interventions that pushed the growth rate below the recovery rate. In this new phase of the pandemic many countries show an almost linear growth of confirmed cases for extended time-periods. This new containment regime is hard to explain by traditional models where infection numbers either grow explosively until herd immunity is reached, or the epidemic is completely suppressed (zero new cases). Here we offer an explanation of this puzzling observation based on the structure of contact networks. We show that for any given transmission rate there exists a critical number of social contacts, , below which linear growth and low infection prevalence must occur. Above traditional epidemiological dynamics takes place, as e.g. in SIR-type…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
