COVID-19: The unreasonable effectiveness of simple models
Timoteo Carletti, Duccio Fanelli, Francesco Piazza

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that COVID-19 outbreak dynamics can be effectively modeled using simple SIR models, highlighting the importance of early and extensive testing to accurately identify the true epidemic peak and reduce overall deaths.
Contribution
It reveals the universality of simple SIR models in describing COVID-19 dynamics and introduces a method to quantify testing biases from data.
Findings
COVID-19 dynamics belong to the simple SIR universality class.
Testing bias can be quantified and used to extract accurate epidemic information.
Early and extensive testing correlates with earlier true peaks and fewer deaths.
Abstract
When the novel coronavirus disease SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19) was officially declared a pandemic by the WHO in March 2020, the scientific community had already braced up in the effort of making sense of the fast-growing wealth of data gathered by national authorities all over the world. However, despite the diversity of novel theoretical approaches and the comprehensiveness of many widely established models, the official figures that recount the course of the outbreak still sketch a largely elusive and intimidating picture. Here we show unambiguously that the dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak belongs to the simple universality class of the SIR model and extensions thereof. Our analysis naturally leads us to establish that there exists a fundamental limitation to any theoretical approach, namely the unpredictable non-stationarity of the testing frames behind the reported figures. However, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
