Revisited reference solar proton event of 23-Feb-1956: Assessment of the cosmogenic-isotope method sensitivity to extreme solar events
Ilya G. Usoskin, Sergey A. Koldobskiy, Gennady A. Kovaltsov, Eugene V., Rozanov, Timophei V. Sukhodolov, Alexander L. Mishev, Irina A. Mironova

TL;DR
This study evaluates the sensitivity of cosmogenic-isotope proxy methods to detect extreme solar proton events, revealing that combining multiple records can significantly improve detection capabilities and fill the observational gap in event strength.
Contribution
The paper introduces a new assessment of the proxy method sensitivity, demonstrating that combining isotope records enhances detection of extreme solar events by an order of magnitude.
Findings
Single isotope records are too weak to reliably detect extreme events.
Combining multiple proxy records increases detection sensitivity by 4-5 times.
This approach can expand the known extreme solar event statistics from a few to several tens.
Abstract
Our direct knowledge of solar eruptive events is limited to several decades and does not include extreme events, which can only be studied by the indirect proxy method over millennia, or by a large number of sun-like stars. There is a gap, spanning 1--2 orders of magnitude, in the strength of events between directly observed and reconstructed ones. Here, we study the proxy-method sensitivity to identify extreme solar particle events (SPEs). First, the strongest directly observed SPE (23-Feb-1956), used as a reference for proxy-based reconstructions, was revisited using the newly developed method. Next, the sensitivity of the cosmogenic-isotope method to detect a reference SPE was assessed against the precision and number of individual isotopic records, showing that it is too weak by a factor 30 to be reliably identified in a single record. Uncertainties of 10Be and 14C data are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
