Detailed chemical compositions of planet hosting stars: I. Exploration of possible planet signatures
F. Liu, D. Yong, M. Asplund, H. S. Wang, L. Spina, L. Acuna, J., Melendez, and I. Ramirez

TL;DR
This study conducts a detailed chemical analysis of 16 planet-hosting stars and 68 comparison stars, revealing diverse abundance patterns that may be linked to planet formation processes, but no definitive chemical signature of planet formation is identified.
Contribution
The paper provides high-precision differential chemical abundances for planet-hosting stars and comparison stars, exploring potential chemical signatures of planet formation.
Findings
Confirmed the Sun's negative abundance trend with condensation temperature.
Observed diverse abundance-condensation temperature trends among planet hosts.
No clear universal chemical signature of planet formation was found.
Abstract
We present a line-by-line differential analysis of a sample of 16 planet hosting stars and 68 comparison stars using high resolution, high signal-to-noise ratio spectra gathered using Keck. We obtained accurate stellar parameters and high-precision relative chemical abundances with average uncertainties in \teff, \logg, [Fe/H] and [X/H] of 15 K, 0.034 [cgs], 0.012 dex and 0.025 dex, respectively. For each planet host, we identify a set of comparison stars and examine the abundance differences (corrected for Galactic chemical evolution effect) as a function of the dust condensation temperature, \tcond, of the individual elements. While we confirm that the Sun exhibits a negative trend between abundance and \tcond, we also confirm that the remaining planet hosts exhibit a variety of abundance \tcond\ trends with no clear dependence upon age, metallicity or \teff. The diversity in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
