Studying Type II supernovae as cosmological standard candles using the Dark Energy Survey
T. de Jaeger, L. Galbany, S. Gonz\'alez-Gait\'an, R. Kessler, A. V., Filippenko, F. F\"orster, M. Hamuy, P. J. Brown, T. M. Davis, C. P., Guti\'errez, C. Inserra, G F. Lewis, A. M\"oller, D. Scolnic, M. Smith, D., Brout, D. Carollo, R. J. Foley, K. Glazebrook, S. R. Hinton

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates the potential of Type II supernovae as independent cosmological distance indicators using data from the Dark Energy Survey, highlighting their utility and challenges for future cosmological measurements.
Contribution
It presents the largest Hubble diagram for SNe II, assesses their standardization, and explores biases and improvements for their use in cosmology.
Findings
Hubble diagram with 70 SNe II shows 0.27 mag dispersion
Adding color term does not reduce scatter
Simulations estimate redshift-dependent biases
Abstract
Despite vast improvements in the measurement of the cosmological parameters, the nature of dark energy and an accurate value of the Hubble constant (H) in the Hubble-Lema\^itre law remain unknown. To break the current impasse, it is necessary to develop as many independent techniques as possible, such as the use of Type II supernovae (SNe II). The goal of this paper is to demonstrate the utility of SNe II for deriving accurate extragalactic distances, which will be an asset for the next generation of telescopes where more-distant SNe II will be discovered. More specifically, we present a sample from the Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program (DES-SN) consisting of 15 SNe II with photometric and spectroscopic information spanning a redshift range up to 0.35. Combining our DES SNe with publicly available samples, and using the standard candle method (SCM), we construct the largest…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
