TL;DR
This paper develops a method to estimate systematic biases in cosmological parameter inference caused by common modeling approximations, highlighting significant biases from the Limber approximation and neglecting lensing magnification, especially in multi-tracer analyses.
Contribution
It introduces a general expression for a priori estimation of systematic biases and presents Multi_CLASS, a new tool for computing cross-power spectra for different tracers.
Findings
Biases in cosmological parameters from common approximations.
Neglecting lensing magnification causes significant biases.
Multi-tracer analyses amplify the biases, especially for $f_{NL}$.
Abstract
Cosmological parameter estimation from forthcoming experiments promise to reach much greater precision than current constraints. As statistical errors shrink, the required control over systematic errors increases. Therefore, models or approximations that were sufficiently accurate so far, may introduce significant systematic biases in the parameter best-fit values and jeopardize the robustness of cosmological analyses. We present a general expression to estimate a priori the systematic error introduced in parameter inference due to the use of insufficiently good approximations in the computation of the observable of interest or the assumption of an incorrect underlying model. Although this methodology can be applied to measurements of any scientific field, we illustrate its power by studying the effect of modeling the angular galaxy power spectrum incorrectly. We also introduce…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
