Why Are There So Few Women in Physics? Reflections on the Experiences of Two Women
Danny Doucette, Chandralekha Singh

TL;DR
This paper explores the personal experiences of two women in physics, highlighting barriers like low self-efficacy, isolation, and stereotype threat that contribute to women's underrepresentation in the field.
Contribution
It provides qualitative insights into the challenges faced by women in physics and suggests potential strategies to improve their experiences and retention.
Findings
Low self-efficacy affects women's engagement in physics.
Isolation and stereotype threat hinder women's success.
Recognition and supportive environments can improve women's persistence.
Abstract
Some of the reasons for the underrepresentation of women in physics are evident in the reflections of two undergraduate women. Leia is a chemistry major who loves college-level physical chemistry and quantum mechanics but does not identify with the discipline of physics, partly because she has a low level of self-efficacy as a physicist and has received very little recognition for her work and learning in physics. Paulette is a physics major who loves physics but feels isolated by the current physics learning environment. She reluctantly dropped honors introductory lab after being snubbed by her male classmates who partnered with one another, leaving her to work alone. Paulette's experiences with condescending male professors activated a stereotype threat about who can succeed in physics that caused her to disengage in class. We also discuss what these women felt has helped them so far…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
