Broad-band X-ray observation of broad-line radio galaxy 3C 109

TL;DR

This study analyzes multi-epoch broad-band X-ray data of 3C 109, revealing a variable photon index, a constrained high-energy cutoff, and a revised black hole mass, challenging previous super-Eddington assumptions.

Contribution

First to constrain the high-energy cutoff and revise the black hole mass estimate of 3C 109 using multi-epoch broad-band X-ray observations.

Findings

Photon index decreased from 1.61 to 1.54 over time.

High-energy cutoff constrained at 49 keV.

Revised black hole mass to 9.3 x 10^8 M_sun, resolving super-Eddington controversy.

Abstract

We present a study of the central engine in the broad-line radio galaxy 3C 109. To investigate the immediate surrounding of this accreting, supermassive black hole, we perform a multi-epoch broad-band spectral analysis of a joint NuSTAR/XMM observation (2017), an archival xmm observation (2005) and the 105-month averaged Swift-BAT data. We are able to clearly separate the spectrum into a primary continuum, neutral and ionized absorption, and a reflection component. The photon index of the primary continuum has changed since 2005 ($\Gamma = 1.61 \substack{+0.02 \\ -0.01} \rightarrow 1.54 \pm{0.02}$), while other components remain unchanged, indicative of minimal geometric changes to the central engine. We constrain the high-energy cutoff of 3C 109 (E$_{\text{cut}}= 49 \substack{+7 \\ -5}$\,keV ) for the first time. The reflector is found to be ionized (log $\xi$ = $2.3 \substack{+0.1 \\ -0.2}$) but no relativistic blurring is required by the data. SED analysis confirms the super-Eddington nature of 3C 109 initially ($\lambda_{Edd} >$ 2.09). However, we do not find any evidence for strong reflection (R = $0.18 \substack{+0.04 \\ -0.03}$) or a steep power law index, as expected from a super-Eddington source. This puts the existing virial mass estimate of 2 $\times 10^{8}$M$_{\odot}$ into question. We explore additional ways of estimating the Eddington ratio, some of which we find to be inconsistent with our initial SED estimate. We obtain a new black hole mass estimate of 9.3 $\times 10^{8}$M$_{\odot}$, which brings all Eddington ratio estimates into agreement and does not require 3C 109 to be super-Eddington.