Learning Adjustment Sets from Observational and Limited Experimental Data
Sofia Triantafillou, Gregory Cooper

TL;DR
This paper presents a novel method that combines observational and limited experimental data to identify adjustment sets, thereby improving causal effect estimation and making inferences beyond traditional approaches.
Contribution
It introduces a new approach that leverages both data types to identify adjustment sets and enhance causal inference, surpassing existing methods.
Findings
Successfully identifies adjustment sets in simulated data.
Improves causal effect estimation over state-of-the-art methods.
Can make additional inferences not possible with observational or experimental data alone.
Abstract
Estimating causal effects from observational data is not always possible due to confounding. Identifying a set of appropriate covariates (adjustment set) and adjusting for their influence can remove confounding bias; however, such a set is typically not identifiable from observational data alone. Experimental data do not have confounding bias, but are typically limited in sample size and can therefore yield imprecise estimates. Furthermore, experimental data often include a limited set of covariates, and therefore provide limited insight into the causal structure of the underlying system. In this work we introduce a method that combines large observational and limited experimental data to identify adjustment sets and improve the estimation of causal effects. The method identifies an adjustment set (if possible) by calculating the marginal likelihood for the experimental data given…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Algorithms · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Neural Networks and Applications
