Two arguments that the nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function are irrational. II
Marek Wolf

TL;DR
This paper extends computational experiments on the first 40,000 nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function, providing numerical evidence supporting their irrationality through continued fraction analysis.
Contribution
It significantly increases the dataset size and accuracy of zeros analyzed, strengthening the numerical evidence for their irrationality.
Findings
Continued fraction denominators' means approach Khinchin's constant.
Square roots of denominators approach Khinchin-Levy constant.
Results support the hypothesis that the zeros are irrational.
Abstract
We extend the results of our previous computer experiment performed on the first 2600 nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function calculated with 1000 digits accuracy to the set of 40000 first zeros given with 40000 decimal digits accuracy. We calculated the geometrical means of the denominators of continued fractions expansions of these zeros and for all cases we get values very close to the Khinchin's constant, which suggests that are irrational. Next we have calculated the -th square roots of the denominators of the convergents of the continued fractions obtaining values very close to the Khinchin---L{\'e}vy constant, again supporting the common opinion that are irrational.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
