Nature of the spin resonance mode in CeCoIn$_5$
Yu Song, Weiyi Wang, John S. Van Dyke, Naveen Pouse, Sheng Ran, Duygu, Yazici, A. Schneidewind, Petr Cermak, Y. Qiu, M. B. Maple, Dirk K. Morr and, Pengcheng Dai

TL;DR
The study reveals that the spin resonance mode in CeCoIn$_5$ is not a sign-changing superconducting indicator but likely results from reduced damping of magnon-like excitations near magnetic quantum criticality.
Contribution
This work challenges the common interpretation of spin resonance modes as evidence of sign-changing superconductivity, providing an alternative explanation for CeCoIn$_5$.
Findings
SRM in CeCoIn$_5$ is not a spin-excitonic bound state.
SRM likely arises from reduced damping of magnon-like modes.
Highlights the need for more rigorous tests of SRMs as indicators of sign-changing superconductivity.
Abstract
Spin-fluctuation-mediated unconventional superconductivity can emerge at the border of magnetism, featuring a superconducting order parameter that changes sign in momentum space. Detection of such a sign-change is experimentally challenging, since most probes are not phase-sensitive. The observation of a spin resonance mode (SRM) from inelastic neutron scattering is often seen as strong phase-sensitive evidence for a sign-changing superconducting order parameter, by assuming the SRM is a spin-excitonic bound state. Here, we show that for the heavy fermion superconductor CeCoIn, its SRM defies expectations for a spin-excitonic bound state, and is not a manifestation of sign-changing superconductivity. Instead, the SRM in CeCoIn likely arises from a reduction of damping to a magnon-like mode in the superconducting state, due to its proximity to magnetic quantum criticality. Our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
