Ontology and Cognitive Outcomes
David Limbaugh, Jobst Landgrebe, David Kasmier, Ronald Rudnicki, James, Llinas, Barry Smith

TL;DR
This paper proposes an ontology-based approach using outcomes-based learning to model and support the cognitive processes of intelligence analysts, emphasizing the trustworthiness of representations of knowledge.
Contribution
It introduces a cognitive process ontology focusing on veridical representations, enhancing reliability in intelligence analysis through outcomes-based learning.
Findings
Ontology of cognitive processes for intelligence analysis
Warranted representations are reliably produced items of knowledge
Supports improved information integration and decision-making
Abstract
Here we understand 'intelligence' as referring to items of knowledge collected for the sake of assessing and maintaining national security. The intelligence community (IC) of the United States (US) is a community of organizations that collaborate in collecting and processing intelligence for the US. The IC relies on human-machine-based analytic strategies that 1) access and integrate vast amounts of information from disparate sources, 2) continuously process this information, so that, 3) a maximally comprehensive understanding of world actors and their behaviors can be developed and updated. Herein we describe an approach to utilizing outcomes-based learning (OBL) to support these efforts that is based on an ontology of the cognitive processes performed by intelligence analysts. Of particular importance to the Cognitive Process Ontology is the class Representation that is Warranted.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Semantic Web and Ontologies · Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence
