Do neutrons disagree with photons about where they have been inside an interferometer?
Lev Vaidman

TL;DR
Recent experiments with nested Mach-Zehnder interferometers suggest particles do not follow continuous trajectories inside the interferometers, challenging traditional notions of particle paths.
Contribution
The paper analyzes recent experiments and argues that they support a non-classical view of particle location, contrasting with claims of continuous trajectories.
Findings
Experiments support non-continuous particle localization.
Particles inside interferometers do not follow classical paths.
The analysis challenges traditional trajectory assumptions.
Abstract
Recent experiments with identically tuned nested Mach-Zehnder interferometers which attempted to observe the location of particles inside these interferometers are analyzed. In spite of claims to the contrary, it is argued that all experiments support the same surprising picture according to which the location of the particles inside the interferometers is not described by continuous trajectories.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs · Biofield Effects and Biophysics
