On the stability of the Brazilian presidential regime: a statistical analysis
Frederico Fetter, Daniel Gamermann, Carolina Brito

TL;DR
This study analyzes Brazil's presidential regime stability from 1991 to 2019 by examining legislative votes, party cohesion, polarization, and coalition shifts, revealing patterns associated with stable periods and impeachments.
Contribution
It introduces a quantitative approach using clustering and polarization measures to characterize regime stability and analyze the dynamics leading to impeachment in Brazil.
Findings
Stronger polarization occurs during stable legislative periods.
Majority coalitions tend to shift to opposition before impeachments.
Party cohesion and coalition dynamics are key indicators of regime stability.
Abstract
Brazil's presidential system is characterized by the existence of many political parties that are elected for the Chamber of Deputies and unite in legislative coalitions to form a majority. Since the re-democratization in 1985, Brazil has had 8 direct presidential elections, among which there were two impeachments of the elected president. In this work we characterize the stability of the presidential regime and the periods of rupture analysing the votes that took place in the Chamber of Deputies from 1991 to 2019. We start by measuring the cohesion of the parties and the congress in the votes, quantifying the agreement between the votes of congressmen and observe that there is a stronger polarization among congressmen during legislative periods where there was no impeachment, referred to here as stable legislative periods. Using clustering algorithms, we are able to associate these…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
