Joint Progressive Knowledge Distillation and Unsupervised Domain Adaptation

TL;DR

This paper introduces a novel joint approach combining unsupervised knowledge distillation and domain adaptation to produce compact, high-accuracy CNN models tailored for specific target domains, especially in resource-constrained scenarios.

Contribution

It proposes a new method that simultaneously compresses and adapts CNNs by progressively teaching a student model domain-invariant features using both source and target data.

Findings

Achieves higher accuracy than existing methods on Office31 and ImageClef-DA datasets.

Requires comparable or lower computational complexity.

Effectively combines knowledge distillation with domain adaptation for CNN compression.

Abstract

Currently, the divergence in distributions of design and operational data, and large computational complexity are limiting factors in the adoption of CNNs in real-world applications. For instance, person re-identification systems typically rely on a distributed set of cameras, where each camera has different capture conditions. This can translate to a considerable shift between source (e.g. lab setting) and target (e.g. operational camera) domains. Given the cost of annotating image data captured for fine-tuning in each target domain, unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) has become a popular approach to adapt CNNs. Moreover, state-of-the-art deep learning models that provide a high level of accuracy often rely on architectures that are too complex for real-time applications. Although several compression and UDA approaches have recently been proposed to overcome these limitations, they do not allow optimizing a CNN to simultaneously address both. In this paper, we propose an unexplored direction -- the joint optimization of CNNs to provide a compressed model that is adapted to perform well for a given target domain. In particular, the proposed approach performs unsupervised knowledge distillation (KD) from a complex teacher model to a compact student model, by leveraging both source and target data. It also improves upon existing UDA techniques by progressively teaching the student about domain-invariant features, instead of directly adapting a compact model on target domain data. Our method is compared against state-of-the-art compression and UDA techniques, using two popular classification datasets for UDA -- Office31 and ImageClef-DA. In both datasets, results indicate that our method can achieve the highest level of accuracy while requiring a comparable or lower time complexity.