Intermittent yet coordinated regional strategies can alleviate the COVID-19 epidemic: a network model of the Italian case

TL;DR

This study models Italy as a network of regions to analyze COVID-19 spread and demonstrates that coordinated regional strategies can effectively control the epidemic and facilitate safe reopening.

Contribution

It introduces a network model of Italy's regions, highlighting the importance of heterogeneity and coordination in regional interventions for epidemic control.

Findings

National lockdown was effective at the regional level.

Differentiated regional strategies can prevent health system saturation.

Coordination among regions enhances epidemic management.

Abstract

The COVID-19 epidemic that emerged in Wuhan China at the end of 2019 hit Italy particularly hard, yielding the implementation of strict national lockdown rules (Phase 1). There is now a hot ongoing debate in Italy and abroad on what the best strategy is to restart a country to exit a national lockdown (Phase 2). Previous studies have focused on modelling possible restarting scenarios at the national level, overlooking the fact that Italy, as other nations around the world, is divided in administrative regions who can independently oversee their own share of the Italian National Health Service. In this study, we show that regionalism, and heterogeneity between regions, is essential to understand the spread of the epidemic and, more importantly, to design effective post Lock-Down strategies to control the disease. To achieve this, we model Italy as a network of regions and parameterize the model of each region on real data spanning almost two months from the initial outbreak. Using the model, we confirm the effectiveness at the regional level of the national lockdown strategy implemented so far by the Italian government to mitigate the spread of the disease and show its efficacy at the regional level. We also propose that differentiated, albeit coordinated, regional interventions can be effective in Phase 2 to restart the country and avoid future recurrence of the epidemic, while avoiding saturation of the regional health systems and mitigating impact on costs. Our study and methodology can be easily extended to other levels of granularity (provinces or counties in the same region or states in other federal countries, etc.) to support policy- and decision-makers.