On estimating the size of overcoverage with the latent class model. A critique of the paper "Population Size Estimation Using Multiple Incomplete Lists with Overcoverage" by di Cecco, di Zio, Filipponi and Rocchetti (2018, JOS 34 557-572)
Peter G M van der Heijden, Paul A. Smith

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the use of latent class models for estimating overcoverage in population size studies, questioning the interpretation of model parameters and their practical usefulness.
Contribution
It provides a critique of prior work by analyzing the limitations and interpretability issues of latent class models in overcoverage estimation.
Findings
Questions the interpretability of latent class model parameters
Highlights limitations of latent class models for overcoverage estimation
Suggests need for alternative methods or careful interpretation
Abstract
We read with interest the article by di Cecco et al. (2018), but have reservations about the usefulness of the latent class model specifically for estimating overcoverage. In particular, we question the interpretation of the parameters of the fitted latent class model.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCensus and Population Estimation · Data-Driven Disease Surveillance · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
