Tilting Uranus: Collisions versus Spin--Orbit Resonance
Zeeve Rogoszinski, Douglas P. Hamilton

TL;DR
This paper examines whether Uranus's extreme tilt resulted from spin-orbit resonance or giant impacts, finding that resonance alone is unlikely to produce the observed obliquity, which supports the impact hypothesis.
Contribution
It combines numerical resonance modeling with a new collisional code to evaluate the likelihood of different scenarios for Uranus's obliquity.
Findings
Resonance capture can tilt Uranus up to 40 degrees in 10 million years.
A single 1 Earth-mass impact can explain Uranus's current spin state.
Resonance alone is insufficient to produce 98-degree tilt, favoring the impact hypothesis.
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate whether Uranus's 98 obliquity was a by-product of a secular spin-orbit resonance assuming that the planet originated closer to the Sun. In this position, Uranus's spin precession frequency is fast enough to resonate with another planet located beyond Saturn. Using numerical integration, we show that resonance capture is possible in a variety of past solar system configurations, but that the timescale required to tilt the planet to 90 is of the order yr -- a timespan that is uncomfortably long. A resonance kick could tilt the planet to a significant 40 in yr only if conditions were ideal. We also revisit the collisional hypothesis for the origin of Uranus's large obliquity. We consider multiple impacts with a new collisional code that builds up a planet by summing the angular momentum imparted from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstro and Planetary Science · Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies · Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
